Here’s the thing: ideally, the business of
retiring the numbers of former players who brought distinction to the Maple
Leaf organization would have been done properly decades ago. But that not being
the case, it was very good to see current management, led by Brendan Shanahan,
be decisive in determining that the 100th anniversary season would
be the time to do it.
Let’s give credit where credit is—the Leafs
have been trying since the days of Ken Dryden (as team President) to be more
adept at doing the “right” things in terms of public relations and community
awareness. Not to pin everything on Harold Ballard, but certain aspects of the
organization seemed to fall short during his lengthy tenure as majority owner—except
that he made a lot of money off the team.
Fair enough, I guess.
But I always wondered why the organization
was so determined to be different than say, the Montreal Canadiens, when it
came to retiring the jerseys of worthy players. The Habs were—and are—rightfully
proud of their team’s legacy, whether we’re talking about Aurel Joliat, Howie
Morenz, Butch Bouchard, The “Rocket” (right), Beliveau, Dickie Moore, Doug Harvey,
Jacques Plante, "Boom Boom" Geoffrion, Yvan Cournoyer or more (relatively
speaking) modern era players like Lafleur, Robinson, Savard, Lapointe, etc.
We, as Leaf followers, can be just as proud
of our history, though we obviously don’t have as many championship banners to
raise to the roof as they do in Montreal.
The surprise announcement this past
Saturday kind of makes amends, I suppose.
And credit to Lou Lamoriello and Shanahan. Born in 1953, I was not around long enough or
old enough to see guys like Syl Apps and Teeder Kennedy or King Clancy and Turk
Broda. But appreciating the history of this franchise because of countless
hours spent with my father talking hockey (though Dad was a passionate Hab
fan, ugh), I have an understanding of what players like that meant to the
franchise built by the legendary Conn Smythe.
I was fortunate to have seen players like Armstrong,
Mahovlich, Keon, Bower, Tim Horton and Red Kelly in the Leaf blue and white for many years. Now, it
certainly was not just those individuals who won those four championships in
the 1960s—there were so many valuable contributors to those Cup-winning efforts. But they were each unique players who were
difference-makers on winning teams.
In more recent years, wonderful players
like Salming and Sittler (left), Gilmour and Clark and of course Sundin thrilled fans
across the country as Leaf greats.
Each in their own way made Leaf fans proud
and created a lifetime of memories for all of us.
I know Leaf supporters of today are,
understandably, most interested in talking about the team right now, not constantly harking back to the “old days”. On that note, “right
now” may well be the most truly hopeful Leaf supporters have been in well over
a decade, because we may have more young talent here than there has been in the
organization in about as long as I can remember.
Yes, we have to see how all the “kids” do
over time. But whether we’re talking about Rielly, Marner, Nylander, Matthews
or some of the other youngsters beginning to make an impression, there are
better days ahead. Finally.
Wonderful piece, Michael. It reflects exactly how I feel. I never understood the shoddy treatment of old Leafs, and the apparent inability of each regime to change it. I was moved by seeing the reactions of so many of my childhood heroes as their banners were raised. And though I know it's open to discussion, Dave Keon will always be my #1 Leaf - his skill, his
ReplyDeletegrace, his leadership by example, and his consistent competitiveness. Well done to Shanahan & Co.!
Well said, as always, Gerund O'. I will simply echo your thoughts.
ReplyDeletemichael, nice to see you writing again! i'm looking forward to the return of the usual-suspects in the comments: jim, gerund (hey gerund!), intimefor62, ralph, and all of the others... i really enjoy your articles (and the comments!).
ReplyDeletego leafs! (and, go blue jays!)
Good to hear from you, Alex- yes, I too look forward to connecting with VLM'ers who have taken the time to comment so thoughtfully over the years. It just may be that the Leafs can make some noise this season!
DeleteHi Michael:
ReplyDeleteGood to see you are back. With centennial, it should be a good year for VLM.
I do not begrudge any of the players having their number retired, but I have a somewhat different perspective.
1. Numbers should mean something. In today's hockey, they really have no meaning. In football, the numbers were representative of the position you played. In hockey, it used to be similar. #1 was goalie, #2-5 was defence, #6 - #19 was everyone else (no #13).
2. You knew that the guy wearing #9 was a sniper, #7 was a playmaker and the single digit numbers were the best players. As a player, it was no compliment to wear #17-19 as it meant you were at the bottom of the lineup. You could tell this without a program.
3. The number represented skill, not individualism. #9 was Howe, Richard, Kennedy, Hull, Bucyk, Bathgate in 6-team NHL.
4. When you are asked a favourite number, it means one digit one to nine, not '82'. Numbers started to be multiples, ex. 44, 66, 77, 88, 99.
In some ways, I like the "Honoured number" method. The problem for the Leafs was in the execution. Replacement players were allowed to wear these special numbers. However, these special numbers should be earned, not given because you wore it it Junior Hockey. Imagine a ceremony where Keon passes on #14 to a newcomer who has proven that he exemplifies his skill and character.
Michael, I took the 1000 mile trip to Toronto this summer and visited the Hockey Hall of Fame. I had no problem with having my picture taken in Canadien's dressing room with multiple #12's. Had picture with Stanley Cup and went to ACC for picture with Legends Row. Neat - nostalgia.
While I visit other Blogs, my favourite and the only one I participate in is still VLM. Thanks.
I was nodding along with all of the points you raised, Ralph (RLMcC). And I agree, there was something to the notion of honouring numbers. (And yes, when we were "younger!", the number 9 had a specific meaning in hockey. Those great players you cited wore that number and it meant something to kids across Canada. (In reference to some of the photos you had taken, in Montreal, #12 was Cournoyer, and before that, Dickie Moore, right??)
DeleteAnd I very much like your notion of Keon or whoever passing along the number 14 to a particular player. As with Broda and Bower, we could retire the same number twice, if the incoming players earns that kind of honour.
Great to be connected again Ralph. Thank you for the kind words about the site. I appreciate hearing that. I look forward to you dropping by throughout the new season.
Michael, I love your posts and have for years. Good to see you back
ReplyDelete-Chuck Diesel from PensionPlan
Thanks for that, Chuck D- much appreciated. Please check in throughout the season!
Delete