Custom Search

Nylander decision good news for Leaf fans; other roster decisions may bode well, too…

I think a lot of Leaf fans, understandably, would have been excited to see William Nylander playing with the big club this season. During exhibition games he flashed some of the vision, hands and speed that should make him a bona fide NHLer before long—maybe even a legitimate difference-maker for the Maple Leafs.

But I was actually relieved to hear on Monday that the Leaf brass had made the decision not to keep Nylander as an 18 year-old.  As tantalizing as the idea is (wouldn’t we all like to see the Leafs draft, sign and develop their own young offensive superstar on the forward lines?), the Leafs, in my view, have done the wise thing.

Why?

Well, the reasons are simple, but I think important.

First, too many young players, even in this day and age, are rushed to the NHL.  The Sabres went through this with one of their gifted youngsters (Grigorenko) just a year ago. He stayed with the big club, but ultimately had nowhere to play because he wasn’t deemed ready for full-time NHL action. He didn’t want to go back to junior hockey and wasn’t allowed to play in the AHL. But the Sabres’ example aside, clubs are sometimes simply in a hurry to push kids along before they are truly ready. Unless you’re Crosby or someone of that ilk, what’s the rush?

Second, Nylander is a small player and likely needs time, like most youngsters, to fully develop before he is truly ready to play in a league like the NHL, where being able to handle the rough going is still a reality.

Beyond that, while he could get hurt playing anywhere, why risk wasting a year of his entry-level contract when he is susceptible to injuries playing in the world’s best league. Are the Leafs that close to being a Cup contender that he will put them over the top?  I don’t think so.

Too, I just believe that he needs time in general to develop as a player. As skilled as he is, he won’t get worse in the next year, only better, I would think, by playing back home in the Swedish Elite League in a familiar environment.  I think we’ll see an even better—and better prepared—player a year from now.

Finally, I think it’s good to see that the Leafs aren't feeling so desperate that they end up making a short-sighted decision to that may well backfire in the long term. It’s a sign that management, including Shanahan, believes there are enough NHL caliber players on this roster that the team can make the playoffs without relying (thankfully) on an 18 year-old.

Maybe most importantly for me, though, is that it will be exciting to know that we have a budding star in the pipeline, getting (hopefully) better every day. When we really need him, he’ll be there.

I have no doubt Nylander will play in the NHL. It’s a matter of when, not if.  But I’d much prefer, as I have said about other Leaf prospects before him, that when he does make our roster, that he doesn't need to be on the old Leaf yo-yo heading back and forth between the Marlies and the big club.  Once he’s here, I want him to stay here—for good.

**

My sense is many Leaf fans will be pleased to see that the Leafs have placed Colton Orr and Frazer McLaren on waivers.  While both players did their job and gave everything they had in their limited opportunities here, the evolution of the game is such that they seem expendable in the current NHL.  Whether Carlyle was out-voted or not on this decision, I don’t know. But surely if the Leafs need that kind of toughness—i.e. the willingness to fight to defend teammates or turn the momentum of a game, if you believe in that sort of thing—there are still rugged players on the roster who can fill that irregular niche while playing real minutes and contributing in other important ways.

It took a while, but Carlyle should no longer be making some of the game-night roster decisions that left a lot of fans shaking their heads over the past two seasons.

**

I still don't know, realistically, how high the ceiling is for this year's edition of the Maple Leafs. But regardless, it’s been a long time between meaningful games, eh? It’s time, finally, to drop the puck Wednesday night against the Habs. 



23 comments:

  1. Hi Michael,

    he is far from ready, he needs to develop and grow stronger. He is a boy.
    And I would not be suprised if he would play for the Marlies next season to get the european play out of him.

    Sending him back to Sweden is the right decission.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Marcus- I, too, would not have a problem if Nylander spent a couple of years getting ready to join the Leafs. As I wrote, once he's here, I'd like him to be ready to stay here and be a significant contributor.

      Delete
    2. Get the European out of him? That doesn't sound insulting to a large amount of people. Detroit has missed the playoffs about as much as we've made it in the past decade based on the European in them.

      Plus let's not underestimate someone based on appearances. No matter how much like a kid his face looks, that guy was not left behind fitness wise at the draft combine. He's just not incredibly tall which is something you can just cross fingers about and see what happens.

      Still a good move to get him some more development time and not rush things along. Just needs the opportunities to continue to get better.

      Delete
    3. anon, marcus wasn't meaning any insult/disrespect... good grief. the european playing style, the european rinks, and the european languages, are all potential barriers to his development for north american professional hockey.

      otherwise it sounds like we're all in agreement that it's a good thing for young nylander to not make the leafs full-time this year. cheers!

      Delete
    4. Thank you for your support alex. This is exactly what I meant. The rinks and therefore the skating style are very diffrent. He made some moves in the last game that could really hurt him in a real NHL game. And this is exactly the reason why he is not playing with the Marlies know.
      Thank you Alex!

      Anon, I am european myself.

      Delete
  2. Hi Michael.

    I think giving Nylander more time is for the best and I believe he had some say in the decision where he would go if he wasn't ready. I admit I would have enjoyed seeing him with the Marlies but Modo is fine and away from the media distraction.

    I doubt Carlyle is very comfortable sending Orr down with McLaren. I don't see the enforcer as he is today being able to deter anything. Most teams have a rat, and they don't feel any obligation to fight though years ago they might have felt honour-bound to accept.There were a lot of liberties taken last year with several of the Leafs top six players and goalies and our enforcers couldn't or wouldn't do a thing about it. If the team can play a tough, competitive game, Randy might be able to let them go for good.

    It seems Shanahan wants to see his management and coaching staff in action before he makes important decisions. I thought the timing of the Poulin and Loiselle firings, in the middle of a busy off-season was interesting and may say a lot about how Shanahan operates. There was something he didn't like--maybe taking $200,000 back on the Gunnar trade when you've spent the previous season capped to the maximum. At any rate, I think we have someone who knows what he's doing.

    An injury to any key players will hurt this season and I'll add Robidas because I've never seen Phaneuf look so focused and relaxed. There are a few teams in the East that are looking stronger this year. The Leafs may have to depend on a bit of luck but we we are seeing some changes --better systems, a few youngsters getting a chance, enforcers demoted, an actual 4th line-- that I'd never thought we'd see. A transitional year perhaps, without high expectations, but I think we're about enjoy some good hockey. I have some confidence that Shanahan has a plan B ready if we don't.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that this is shaping up as a transitional year for the Leafs, Colleen- with some good early signs in terms of decisions that have been made.

      Delete
    2. Hey Colleen,

      I hope you noticed the way way they played defense against Detroit.

      Delete
    3. Hi Marcus--I did. What a difference! They looked less confused after a few days with Horachuk than after two years with Carlyle and staff. ( you told me they would! ) I was so happy to finally see Robidas. Percy seems very calm and steady for such a young player. Even in a preseason game, I was impressed.

      Delete
    4. And they did what I told you, they tried to brak their play up at the opposing blue line.
      And they do not give up the neutral Zone easily. Way to go!

      Delete
  3. Seems like you hit all the high points on Nylander... I'm so glad we don't have to rush him into the lineup (like a Ryan Nugent-Hopkins) and risk injury before he has fully developed. Rielly's comeback year in Junior/Marlies stood him in good stead to play at 19 (and he was already 205 lbs), just look at how much he seems to have filled out over the summer and imagine what William could bring with a little time to put some meat on those bones! A shorter schedule in Sweden (playing men not Junior - except for the WJC) and the possibility of a post-playoff stint with the Marlies (not positive about that but think it could happen), might allow a Rielly-like development year out of the spotlight (but with professional pay) and the chance to play on N. American ice.

    I think we will see Orr/McLaren on spot duty call-ups if 'needed' by Randy, but this just allows a 'roster expansion' without having to lose other assets. I doubt we will lose either to waivers, but at least they will still get paid. It seems the end of an era that was never my favourite part of the game anyway (though I don't mind those heat of the game battles, which may start to be more noticeable in the absence of the heavy-weights).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that we may well still have Orr/McLaren available if and when there is truly a need for that kind of combativeness, InTimeFor62. Meantime, we still have some grit in the lineup, and a youngster like Nylander developing in the right environment.

      Delete
  4. I have been saying this for a long time, every case has to be judged individually and in this particular case it was obvious that Nylander wasn't good enough to make this roster. The best place for him is back home in Sweden and I have no doubt he will prosper and be ready next season.

    As for Orr and Fraser, not to mention Holzer I think the Leafs made the right choices. Yes Frattin and Ashton had rough camps, but their upside is still higher than those two. I would rather have them actually contributing to the line up rather than sitting on a bench till its time for the sideshow. Holzer, actually had a decent camp but he simply isn't good enough. I am overjoyed that the management is finally valuing skill over "grit". It is a giant step in the right direction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think we will still need the right kind of "grit", Willbur, but it is good to see the Leafs focus on building a roster with even more skill, too.

      Delete
    2. The right kind of grit is exactly right Michael. I'll take Milan Lucic over Mayson Raymond every day of the week. However, I would take Raymond over Orr, MaClaren, or even Clarkson every day of the week. Kozun is half the man the Orr is but I will take Kozun's grit over Orrs every day.

      Delete
    3. Agreed, Willbur- and that's the kind of grit we've been talking about here for years- Bob Gainey/John Tonnelli/Terry O'Reilly grit, guys who battle and play effectively as well.

      Delete
  5. Thanks for a great site Michael Langlois.
    I thing youre spot on almoste everything on the leafs.
    I realy missed youre and Michael Stephens MLHS Hangout.
    Hope to get many new eps this coming season.

    Cellectra

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Cellectra- I think Leaf fans are ready for a new season.

      Delete
  6. It became apparent in the latter exhibition games that Nylander was not yet physically capable of dealing with NHL players. Leaf management made the correct decision and that, in my opinion, is a refreshing change in philosophy from the Burke win now era. Both Luke Shenn and Nazim Kadri were rushed unnecessarily to the detriment of their development. It looks like there has been a change of philosophy with the new management team toward player development. This is long overdue.

    It is well nigh impossible to get a handle on team progress during exhibition games but as the final roster is being fleshed out there have been some positive signs. The only game that we saw a nearly complete team was the last one and that game provided encouragement.

    The two obvious areas that needed improvement were team defense and penalty killing. There seems to be a more aggressive approach to both. Peter Horachek is an excellent defensive coach {as witnessed by his work in Nashville) and I have confidence that he will provide the impetus to greatly improve the Leafs defensive outlook. Having four viable lines should also be of enormous help in that area. The addition of Daniel Winnik, Leo Komarov and Brandon Kozun should vastly improve the penalty kill.

    It was also encouraging to see some young players such as Leivo, Kozun, Ashton and Percy step up and tentatively make the team. I hope the days of letting a Colborne go in order to keep a one dimensional veteran are long gone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We've certainly talked here before, Pete Cam, about the importance of actually developing the players you draft. It's one thing to draft them, something rather different to actually help them improve the way they need to, in order to be effective at this level. I'm all for having Nylander develop over the next couple of years. There is no urgency in my view for him to be here.

      And yes, there were encouraging signs in the last exhibition game. Now the games begin to matter. Thanks Pete.

      Delete
  7. Great work by Pridham to keep Loov in Toronto and in juggling Bodie and Percy to save quite a lot on the salary cap. I almost want to say Brilliant! but it's not brilliance, just simple competence and smart thinking, the very change we hoped to see in the organization's management group. He reads the WHOLE contract and understands the changing rules when dealing with European leagues. The salary cap is still a mess but it's good to know we have someone who may eventually straighten it out.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good comment Colleen. The Leafs management haven't been able to manage cap situations with a semblance of competence since the 2004-05 lockout. It is nice to see that the new group has someone who finally"gets" it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Michael.
    I'm not one to expect every penalty called but---My Gosh! Was it Subban's birthday? Taking down JVR, then trying to rip Ckarkson's cage off.
    I've never liked Bernier against Montreal and I expected some blips as new players fit in and everyone learns new systems but I was so impressed with the youngsters tonight.

    ReplyDelete