Custom Search

The “new” Leaf I’m most interested in seeing this coming season

Given the somewhat (again) revamped roster of the Maple Leafs heading into the 2013-’14 NHL season, we could pick one of any number of newcomers as the guy we most look forward to seeing in blue and white.   David Clarkson, Jonathan Bernier and Paul Ranger are now on the roster and in each their own way will draw attention because they are the new kids on the block.  We will also be teased by the fact that they also each potentially bring something a little different, skill sets that may help propel the Leafs to a slightly higher gear.  Clarkson has that history of solid point production with a rugged style of play; Bernier has been a “can’t miss” goaltending prospect seemingly forever; Ranger was once a promising NHL rearguard who has been out of the limelight for a few years. Some thought he would actually be in the Leaf lineup a year ago.

Each could contribute very nicely indeed to the Leafs this coming season—and beyond.

Heck, we could even throw some of the kids into the discussion mix.  We saw glimpses of Colborne a year ago, including in the playoffs against the Bruins this past spring and he didn’t look out of place.  Rielly is awfully young but also awfully talented.  And who else may emerge out of nowhere to grab a roster spot at training camp in September?

Yet the guy I am maybe most interested in seeing this coming season is the long-time Blackhawk centerman, Dave Bolland.  I well realize—having been burnt countless times before by the lure of seeing a player I badly wanted from another team that looked fantastic from a distance—Bolland may not be quite what I have envisioned.  His role may be different here than it was in Chicago.  Maybe, at an early age, his offensive peak has already been reached.  Maybe because he has played a lot of playoff hockey already (we haven’t had that problem in Toronto the last decade, eh?) he has a fair bit of wear on his hockey tires.  And maybe the Bolland I saw as a developing young player a few years ago in Chicago may not be the same Bolland who suits up for the Leafs this coming season.  I don’t know.

But do you remember how I’ve talked here often before about needing guys on this roster who have ‘been there’ before?  How we needed players with grit, who have shown they could play when it matters?  You know, individuals with playoff savvy, people who bring leadership and winning experience to the table.

I think Bolland brings those things.

Here is a player who has helped the Hawks win two Stanley Cups already in his young career.  Was he a dominant player for Chicago in the playoffs?  Perhaps not, but he was certainly useful.  He played 22 playoff matches when his club won in 2010, and 18 this past spring.  At 27, he should be in the prime of his career. Unlike many other Leaf “star player” acquisitions over the years, we’re getting this guy in his prime years—not when he is 33 or 34 already.

We have batted around where exactly he fits on this roster (he has never scored 20 goals in a season, so we may be a bit into our cups if we hope he will suddenly score 30 a year with the Leafs), as in, can he be that elusive second-line center we need?  (In truth, since Kadri has emerged as a second-line player, what we really need is a first-line center, but that’s all a topic for another day.)

Realistically, it’s likely that Bolland slots in as a solid third-line pivot, with responsibility for dealing with the best center on the other team in Randy Carlyle’s “system”.  Can he handle that?  Well, it’s a responsibility he seemed to relish in Chicago, where he was, if not exactly surrounded by, certainly in the company of some elite offensive players like Hossa, Toews and Kane and some very gifted defensemen.

Last season was the first year he has been a minus player in the league.  I’m not sure what that means.  It may mean precious little.  But if he can play at all as he did in Chicago, surely we would be satisfied.  He will likely embrace the role that the now departed Mikhail Grabovski eschewed, which should help Carlyle—and the club.  (Whether that role was at all fair to put Grabbo in is an entirely different question.)

Let me be clear:  I’m not saying Bolland will have a great season.  I’m not suggesting he will be more than what I expect, or even what I hope for when I envision him from his time with the Hawks.

What I am saying is he is someone who piques my curiosity because of his hockey pedigree.  Anyone who has played significant minutes on a very good, two-time NHL championship team, under a well-regarded coach, may be precisely the kind of player I have been describing that the Leafs need.  This is especially so, now that they have made enough roster improvements to, hopefully, be an annual playoff team.  He has experience, he is a defensively smart player, and he has helped very good team become even better -  and win. 

So as things stand now, Bolland’s my guy, the one I am most looking forward to seeing with the Leafs.  But I realize there are some other interesting choices for “most anticipated newcomer”.  As the calendar turns to September and hockey (at least training camp) is now only days away, who is on the top of your list?

22 comments:

  1. For me it's Clarkson.

    Bolland has been consistent and is on a 1 year contract. Bernier could struggle but if Riemer plays well the whole season, it doesn't really matter. But Clarkson with that big long contract, if he doesn't live up to expectations that could sting for years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My sense is you're not alone in looking to see how Clarkson will fit in, DP! Did we get him in his prime, or just a bit past?

      Delete
    2. Just a bit past I think. Here's a guy with middling skills across the board who has shown he can score, hit and fight - but not one at an elite level. Now he's been given an immense contract to live up to, and I believe he will try valiantly, but he will flounder. This will be like watching the dancing bear in a roadside circus in Arizona. Kinda makes you look at your shoes and plan ways to put him out of his misery. And how to make the man at the other end of the chain suffer.

      I know I've used this one before but Clarkson is the second coming of the corpse of Al Secord.

      Delete
    3. I remember Secord so well, buddha hat. After his time in Boston, he absolutely thrived in Chicago. Could score, fight and make plays and was not someone you wanted to match up against. By the time he joined the Leafs, he was on the decline. It's always so hard to tell when that 'tapering off' will begin!.

      Delete
  2. To be honest, I am a lot more excited about seeing our 'old' players such as Kadri, Gardiner, Bozak and Phaneuf (now that he finally gets to play with grown-up decent defencemen and defencively-responsible forwards) than any of the new acquisitions.

    Of the new guys I'd have to say that, like you, I'm most interested in watching what Bolland will bring both in terms of leadership and on the ice. I feel pretty certain about what to expect from Ranger, Clarkson and Bernier. I think we're getting a solid defenceman in Ranger, a hard-nosed gritty winger that will score and fight and hit in clarkson and a talented young golie in Bernier.

    Bolland, unlike the first three, is a mistery to me. He could easily be a total bust - someone who doesn't fit and simply fades away a la Armstrong and Versteeg. It may well turn out that the great players he got to play with in Chicago made him look better than what he is. But it is also possible, as you say Michael, that he'll come into his own here in Toronto and become a star and a leader that takes us to that next level. It seems like most media types and fans are feeling similarly as there's been very little hype surrounding him in Toronto - perhaps the observers are afraid to pronounce either way. I wonder if the lack of interest will be good or bad for Bolland's game. There's many questions. I can't wait to see the answers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point about the returning players, leafdreamer- they are key to any success the Leafs will have this year, too.

      Armstrong and Versteeg are indeed examples of players we thought would come in and provide leadership, but it never quite seemed to happen. We'll see with Bolland...

      Delete
  3. Ranger for me. I think it's pretty undeniable that the Leafs haven't had a problem scoring goals the last number of years, but they have given up a ton! I'm wondering if he can help out the struggling D. I think that the combo of Reimer/Bernier should solidify the goaltending, so, imo, defence is the biggest questionmark...and it's a huge one! If he can be the player he was in TBay (and last year seems to show that maybe he can) then I think he will go a long way to filling the biggest hole in the Leaf roster.

    I think Ranger/Gunnarson will make an excellent 2nd pairing, I feel they really need a guy to play with Phaneuf, maybe Gardiner is that guy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ranger is certainly an intriguing signing, Adam. And by the way, it's entirely possible Gardiner could play first-line minutes. He's a pretty effortless type of player and certainly has shown he can log minutes. If he and Phaneuf match up well, who knows? Thanks for posting, Adam.

      Delete
  4. It is extremely encouraging to me to see the general manager and the coach on the same page. The firing of Burke could have thrown the Leafs into a chaotic situation where a new GM would be intent on putting his stamp on the team with ensuing turnovers in personnel. Instead we had a smooth transition with few changes. I'm sure Nonis had input on the Carlyle hiring and he seems comfortable with him to the point of providing him with Carlyle type players.

    I am looking forward to watching Dave Clarkson, especially in tandem with Kadri and Lupul. I think Clarkson will bring grit and defense to the line and will also score 15 - 20+ goals.

    I am looking forward to watching Dave Bolland. I believe he is an ideal pick-up for the third line centre slot. He is definitely a shut down centre who can negate players like Crosby and Stamkos while chipping in 35 - 45 points. He is also an excellent penalty killer and in effect brings everything that Komorov did but with more scoring.

    I am looking forward to watching Bernier. I hope he proves to be that upcoming star that everyone predicts. I am a Reimer booster but it wouldn't be a bad thing to have two outstanding young goalies as long as a goalie controversy does not develop. It is important to remember that at this point Reimer has never played more than 37 games in an NHL season and Bernier has never played more than 25.

    The new player I am most interested in watching is Paul Ranger. He has size, mobility and toughness. I liked Ranger in Tampa Bay and was disappointed to see such a good young defenseman leave the game. I was happy to see him sign with the Marlies and put in a solid year in the minors in pursuit of getting his game back. If he can provide solid play on the number 3 pairing it would be invaluable. If he could move into the top 2 due to injury it might be the best signing for the money league wide.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Given that the "acquisition cost" for Ranger was essentially zero, other than his salary, Pete Cam, his arrival creates anticipation, for sure. If this roster can stay healthy, it will be very interesting to see what Carlyle can do with a (for the first time) full NHL season to work with. Thanks Pete.

      Delete
  5. I'm interested to watch Bozak to see if he's used the off-season to learn how to put his passes in front of his teammates instead of behind them or in their feet.
    Kessel has a great shot but kicking the puck in is still illegal.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The most intriguing player to watch for me is Reimer.

    More than anyone he will have the most pressure in camp. I am hoping he maintains the calm self-confidence he’s shown in past seasons. It would be very interesting to see how Carlyle handles it if James plays as well as, or better than Bernier.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I was focusing on the new Leafs, but I agree, Steve, I'll be watching to see not only how Reimer plays but how the organization handles the situation. Thanks for visiting.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm glad that Carlyle saw a player he wanted in Bolland (sure worked out with McClement!) and I am interested to see what he brings to the mix, however, I'm like Pete Cam and Adam... really intrigued by the possibilities associated with Ranger.

    I think he'll be better in the NHL than the 'A' because everyone is more consistent being where they need to be, and Ranger is good at getting the puck out of the zone, facilitating the transition to offense. I am wondering if he'll have any lingering concussion effects at the start of the season, so for that reason, I'm sure he'll be bottom pairing 'til he regains his form (and/or someone goes down), though I do see him 'rising' as the season progresses.

    It will also be interesting to watch Clarkson more closely (as we always do with the new guy) than when he was a Devil, but because he's more of a known entity for me, my second choice would be Colborne... hoping he'll find his way and create a role for himself as the season progresses.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ranger certainly will be closely watched, InTimeFor62, and Clarkson and Bolland will garner a lot of attention, too! And you're no doubt right- the coach was surely influential in who the Leafs went after this past off-season.

      Delete
  9. Lupul Bozak Kessel
    JVR Kadri Clarkson
    Kulemin Bolland McLement
    McLaren Colborne Orr

    Phaneuf Gunnerson
    Gardiner Ranger
    Franson Fraser

    Bernier
    Reimer

    *gotta find a way to sign Kadri & Franson....hopefully Nonis can trade Liles to find the cap room! Do it....do it....Go Leafs!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It will be interesting to see if your lineup projections are on the money, Anon- at least to start the year. We'll know in less than a month!

      Delete
  10. I think you bring up an interesting point about grit that the other blogs are omitting, that is the grit to win games. There are those who are skeptical about adding Bolland to an already tough team - using our league leading fighting majors as a statistic - but what we need, and what Bolland will hopefully contribute, is that tenacity to hold leads and win games. How many times last year were we on our heels barely holding on to a lead and subsequently losing games? For all the toughness that we had last year we lacked in that department to hold on in the third period. I think Bolland brings that key ingredient to really solidify our third line. The difference could be an extra 5-10 wins and that will be the difference between making the playoffs.

    I'm not expecting Bolland to contribute points, but with him on the third I really think we have a solid first three lines that can compete with the best of them.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thank you for catching - and commenting on - a key point of distinction when it comes to what real "toughness" is, Raymack.

    As some who visit here regularly know, I have commented many times the over the years about what I believe are the characteristics of a truly "tough" team, and the grit (and tenacity, as you cite) that is required. I'm not talking about fighters in the classic sense, though yes, we have those in Orr and MacLaren (and Fraser). I'm referring to guys who can play the game, play real minutes, not fight once and sit for the rest of the night.

    I think back to players like Bert Olmstead and Dickie Moore in the old days, and to 70s/80s stars like Bob Gainey and Terry O'Reilly and Bob Nystrom. They were all individuals who could check, hit, win battles in the corner and in front of the net and play important minutes at the end of of close games. That's what I like in a "tough" player, and that's what the Leafs have needed for years- someone like a Gary Roberts, for example.

    Now, they seem to have some of those kinds of players again, and it's great to see. I'm hoping Bolland will indeed fit the role your describe. Thanks Raymack.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I am excited to see all the new additions, but I would especially enjoy seeing Paul Ranger succeed. Speed skater Clara Hughes taught us a lot about battling depression and Paul has had his own battle. I would be absolutely thrilled to see him come back strong and inspire others the way Clara has.
    Thanks again for your stories, Mr. Langlois. You put TSN to shame. C.N.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know specifics relating to Ranger's situation, but he is a talented young man who has evidently had to overcome some things. Spending last season in a less pressuresome environment may have been a very good thing for him. He certainly can help the big club and if he feels ready to return to the NHL, we'll all be pulling for him.

      Thank you for posting, and for the kind words, C.N.

      Delete
  13. Having stated my desire to see Paul Ranger succeed this year I just thought I would pass along this excellent story to you and your readers: "The Toronto Maple Leafs' Paul Ranger Couldn't Be Happier..." By Bruce Arthur of the National Post. C.N.

    ReplyDelete